Justice Ginsberg concurred. She implied— contrary to the main opinion— that the principles controlling revocation of good-time credits should control in a case like this. The Ninth Circuit, though, had precedent that the prisoners didn't have federal rights to correct an error of California state law by California.
Texas lawyer Bob Mabry kept you up with legal writing and also with appeals courts, particularly Texas's Court of Criminal Appeals and Beaumont Texas's Ninth Court of Appeals.
About Me
- Bob Mabry
- Civil appellate, criminal appellate, and criminal trial lawyer at 704 North Thompson Street, #157, Conroe, Texas 77301-2578, (936) 494-1393.
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Federal Relief for State Refusal of Parole
The United States Supreme Court, in a per curiam opinion, overruled the Ninth Circuit's requiring California to consider again granting parole for a couple of prisoners. They said federal habeas relief is not available for an error of state law. Also the federal Due Process Clause does not require proper application of California's evidentiary standard for denying parole.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment